TeamPulse
People

Reviews that agree with what actually shipped

A performance agreement in TeamPulse stores references, not descriptions. Each target points at a goal, a key result or a project, so achievement moves as delivery data moves and nobody retypes a status at review time.

Weights must allocate
100%
Weights must allocate
Cycle stages
5
Cycle stages
Calibration grid
9-box
Calibration grid
Feedback sources
360°
Feedback sources
Agreement · A. Mensah
FY26 · 78% weighted
Activation rate ≥ 45%91%
Deliver PRJ-104 by Q378%
Onboarding ≤ 3 days54%
Two engineers to L4100%

Calibration

A rating that means the same in two departments

Managers draft, then calibrate together in one session against a shared distribution. The before and after is kept, so you can show an employee, or a regulator, exactly what moved and why.

  • Self, peer, manager, calibration and share stages
  • 9-box placement on performance against potential
  • Distribution held before and after the session
  • Development plan issued at the end, not a rating alone
See it in the tour
Distribution after calibration
74 scored
Outstanding
12%
Exceeds
28%
Meets
49%
Developing
11%

What is in it

Everything the performance layer holds

Enough structure for a fair process that survives challenge, without asking managers to become administrators.

Weighted targets

Performance agreements

Targets reference a goal, key result or project. Weights must total 100 before an agreement can be signed.

Five stages

Review cycles

Self, peer, manager, calibration and share, with reminders that chase the managers who are behind.

One session

Calibration & 9-box

Compare drafts side by side, place people on performance against potential, and keep the distribution honest.

Per level

Competency matrix

What each level actually requires, so a promotion conversation has something concrete behind it.

IDP

Development plans

Every cycle ends with a plan, not just a score, and the plan feeds the learning module.

Continuous

1:1s & coaching notes

Running notes between cycles, so the review is a summary of the year rather than a surprise.

Pipeline

Promotions & succession

Eligibility rules, nomination flows and succession plans for the roles that matter most.

PIP

Improvement plans

Structured, time-boxed and documented, with the support offered recorded alongside the expectations.

Getting there

A cycle that finishes on time

01

Issue agreements

Targets are drawn from the goals and projects each person already owns, so the first draft writes itself.

02

Run the cycle

Self and peer stages open on a schedule. Reminders go to the people holding it up, not to everyone.

03

Calibrate

Managers meet once with the distribution in front of them and agree what each band means this year.

04

Share and plan

Ratings release together, each with a development plan and the evidence that supported it.

What changes

What teams report after a full cycle

94%
cycle completion

Reminders target the blocker rather than the whole company.

100%
targets traced upward

A target that points nowhere cannot be saved.

0
retyped statuses

Achievement is read from the same data the PMO reports.

1
calibration session

One meeting instead of a month of side conversations.

Score people on what the work actually did

Import your goals and project register, issue agreements from them, and run one cycle end to end on a thirty-day trial.